| Author |
Thread |
|
DarrenJ
Advanced Member
Australia
2,626 posts
Joined: Jul, 2003
|
 Posted - 2010/04/14 : 03:10:43
By dissing our god, you relize you will have bad karma for the rest of your life?
__________________________________
☻hardcore
Alert moderator 
|
Audio Warfare
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,053 posts
Joined: Mar, 2009
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 09:01:52
quote:
Originally posted by catlikethief:
The most disappointing thing about Scott Brown is his scary haircut.
That was a popular 90's raver's haircut over here along with undercuts. :P
Meh Scott Brown is wicked and he seemed a real nice guy when I've spoken to him at parties. A lot of people used to do pretty much exact copies of his tunes without changing sod all and called it a remix, he was probably just fed up of that. That message has been on his site for years.
__________________________________
Listen to released and forthcoming Audio Warfare/Audio Weaponry tunes here:-
http://soundcloud.com/audio-warfare
Alert moderator
|
kathryn
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,520 posts
Joined: Apr, 2005
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 09:22:21
quote:
Originally posted by acidfluxxbass:
never meet your heroes... especially ones whose names you cant spell
;)
Whatever a$$hole.
__________________________________
:)
Alert moderator
|
kathryn
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,520 posts
Joined: Apr, 2005
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 09:23:26
quote:
Originally posted by nicolaslievens:
i don't really like scott brown too.
i respect him because his talented and he had given a lot for hardcore.
i like his tracks because of they are classics, i mean, push it or livewired are maybe 6 or 7 years old and they're still awesome and seems young !
when i want to play a scott brown classic, i don't care about the track i was playing before, i know that those 2 tracks are going to be alright.
you can mix everything with a scott brown track, that's a reason of my respect for him
but what i don't like is that his seems very aggressive, not a pleasant guy
i'm not judging him, i can't and i don't want to, but that the idea i have of him.
also, when i see what he said to dj revs, i think this is not totally wrong: when you begin to produce music, do a remix is not the best training, creating your own music by starting to nothing is better. but is it a solution to say that like that ? no, i don't think so. what's his problem by doing a remix of his tracks ?
first of all, doing a remix is not hell ! if the remix is good, he could be more famous, win more money, only positive things, and if the remix is bad, who'd signed it ? he don't take any risks, and it could give motivation to some people wich could be the upcoming talent of tomorrow !
scott brown is weird on my opinion to say that. i speak like if someone you'd stole or destroy his work...
what wrong by create a remix of you mr brown ??
seems very aggressive,
can you back this up with proof?
__________________________________
:)
Alert moderator
|
kathryn
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,520 posts
Joined: Apr, 2005
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 09:24:55
If some of you on here who are disiing him think you can do better then post links on here?
C'mon lets see.
__________________________________
:)
Alert moderator
|
nicolaslievens
Junior Member
France
113 posts
Joined: Jan, 2010
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 09:38:23
hey, calm down !
i've never said he's a bad producer, if you read my post correctly, you could see that i've much respect for his work !
i've never said i'm better than him
just the thing is that i read lots of thing about on some forums who've spoken about him, that was not very glorious, and when i see what he wrote about the remixes, it seems to be true
also, if you read correctly my post, i wrote that the IDEA that I HAVE about him is (...)
then it could be wrong, i don't know, that's why i said this is in my opinion
but just to clarify, i really like scott brown's tracks, i have lots of his vinyls ;)
Alert moderator
Edited by - nicolaslievens on 2010/04/14 09:40:02 |
SPOOX
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
2,644 posts
Joined: Jul, 2006
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 09:55:47
Doesn't bother me at all what it says on his website. Throughout the years Scott has released so many top quality choons. I will always be a massive Scott Brown fan.
I'm quite glad he's against people remixing his choons. There's plenty that couldn't be made any better anyway.
Alert moderator
|
Lilley
Advanced Member
Australia
3,740 posts
Joined: Jul, 2006
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 11:39:28
quote:
Originally posted by kathryn:
If some of you on here who are disiing him think you can do better then post links on here?
C'mon lets see.
wow. nurofen and naprogesics are readily available, you know?
and what will that prove? That they can't rip off a track as well as he can?
I don't know if he did *steal* them or not. Don't particularly give a rat's ass either way. Just find it funny if indeed he did, and it's verifiable, that he would make a statement such as that.
__________________________________
nearly in line....
.....strange continuity problems
Alert moderator
|
Rookie1992
Junior Member
United Kingdom
121 posts
Joined: Dec, 2009
|
 Posted - 2010/04/14 : 11:54:34
Hes 1 of the reasons most people become a dj ! :L hes one of the best !
__________________________________
Boom Boom, this 1's a ear tweaker.
Alert moderator
|
Revs
Advanced Member
Austria
2,584 posts
Joined: Oct, 2008
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 13:47:24
quote:
Originally posted by Lilley:
and what will that prove? That they can't rip off a track as well as he can?
That made me lol :P
quote:
Originally posted by DJ Lawlzy:
Also, he's not saying "REMIXES ARE BAD, DON'T MAKE THEM." You left out the part that says "No Exceptions to this otherwise legal action CAN be taken" so he probably just doesn't want people making money off of remixes of his tunes. Again, I don't know for sure, that's just my guess.
No, here's what a guy said on his forum:
Theres nothing worng with remixing your tunes scott for personal reasons so long as it doesnt get out of the bedroom is their? its a good learning tool. I do understand that you dont want them to remix your tracks and then start sending them in.
And SB answered:
I can't condone any remixing regardless of what it's for. Read the warning on the side of any cd or vinyl and you'll see. Bottom line is, you want to get records out, write your own stuff. That's how I did it.
A good learning tool would certainly be to use tracks you like as a guide, but ripping it off or remixing it. No.....
I VERY RARELY hear an illegitimate mix I like.
When it comes to Hardcore I agree with his last sentence but I still think it is kinda stupid, he talks like he did all of the work and like he was a God, but actually all his tunes are, like we all already know, ripped from another song.
Also, I have made a Breakbeat Hardcore remix of "All About You" and asked Cat Knight for the vocals, but he didn't want to give them to her. She went to his studio to record them and never got them. Okay I can understand that, but it would still be stupid to not allow this remix, it's a different genre.. and a breakbeat hardcore remix of that tune would be great! Well he doesn't know of this case yet and he hasn't even heard the track, but anyway that wasn't my point..
Alert moderator
|
Fishy
Advanced Member
Norway
2,521 posts
Joined: Apr, 2004
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 16:04:41
Maybe Scott Brown isent able to create hos own melodies
__________________________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/5p4DMSX1fKl07ogZewmRp0?si=X0-Z2b4oQLGex3gvtdazbw
[email protected]
Alert moderator
|
Revs
Advanced Member
Austria
2,584 posts
Joined: Oct, 2008
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 17:58:06
I guess so!
Alert moderator
|
kathryn
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,520 posts
Joined: Apr, 2005
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 18:35:22
quote:
Originally posted by nicolaslievens:
hey, calm down !
i've never said he's a bad producer, if you read my post correctly, you could see that i've much respect for his work !
i've never said i'm better than him
just the thing is that i read lots of thing about on some forums who've spoken about him, that was not very glorious, and when i see what he wrote about the remixes, it seems to be true
also, if you read correctly my post, i wrote that the IDEA that I HAVE about him is (...)
then it could be wrong, i don't know, that's why i said this is in my opinion
but just to clarify, i really like scott brown's tracks, i have lots of his vinyls ;)
Who said my post was about you?
Your just making assumptions chill!
__________________________________
:)
Alert moderator
|
Hard2Get
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
12,837 posts
Joined: Jun, 2001
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 19:04:01
Your concentrating far too much on minor details. Who really cares. Until you've met him and spend enough time with him to know what he is actually like then you will never be able to comment. Stuff you hear from other people or stuff you see written online means **** all. It's pretty ridiculous to make your mind up about someone that you've never met let alone know.
Alert moderator
|
Dain-Ja
Advanced Member
Canada
1,983 posts
Joined: Oct, 2004
|
Posted - 2010/04/14 : 20:10:16
quote:
Originally posted by Fishy:
Maybe Scott Brown isent able to create hos own melodies
This is laughable. Scott Brown has a very distinct melodic style and he's definitely able to write his own riffs.
He may have ripped off some old trance and house for some of his tracks, but that's pretty common in hardcore. The difference is that he approached the tracks in an original way, and added to them. I can understand his frustration with hardcore producers because there's been so many people that have ripped his tracks and added absolutely nothing. They've taken "Neck Breaker" and made a crappier version, with nothing new musically, for example.
When people have interpreted his tracks, and done something original, he has often signed them. For example, Kev Willow, Johnny El, Nu Foundation all got releases on his label.
I hate when people say Elysium is a rip. Sure, the vocal snippet is a rip. Big deal! That's the lamest part of the track anyways...
As for the issue with Cat Knight - that's between him and her and I'm surprised you're airing third party rumours on the internet. If their agreement was for a session vocal, Scott Brown owns the rights to it and there's no reason why he should have to provide the acapella, especially if it's gonna lead to unlicensed remixes. Usually when that's the case, the owner of the rights pays a premium for the vocal in the first place anyways - nothing unfair about that.
I've met Scott and I've worked with promoters that have booked him numerous times. He's never seemed like an ******* when I've spoken to him.
__________________________________
Producer/DJ/Label owner
Rush Delivery Records
Visit makemeRUSH.com for music from the ONLY North American hardcore label pressing vinyl!
FREE track every Monday: http://www.rushdeliveryrecords.com/?p=229
Alert moderator
|
|
Printer friendly
