| Author |
Thread |
|
Audio Warfare
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,047 posts
Joined: Mar, 2009
|
 Posted - 2012/06/07 : 15:21:14
Getting a lot done with this week off work. 8) You may have heard the Hardcore mix, this is the original Hard Trance mix that we started but have just got around to finishing.
http://soundcloud.com/audio-warfare/the-overseer-ft-kathy-sims
I personally think it works a bit better at this speed, sounds so much more lush in the breaks and the drops.
__________________________________
Listen to released and forthcoming Audio Warfare/Audio Weaponry tunes here:-
http://soundcloud.com/audio-warfare
Alert moderator 
|
Warnman
Advanced Member
Germany
2,677 posts
Joined: Jun, 2010
|
Posted - 2012/06/07 : 21:36:44
I don't know! 144 bpm sounds very slow for being Hardtrance to my opinion.
Please don't get me wrong. I like this track, but it feels more like proper Hands-Up (and I'm usually no big supporter of Hands-Up).
The acid line at the end is wonderful. 
__________________________________
Ravers unite!
"Happy Hardcore: Love it... hate it... it's fun!" (Matt Stokes)
Alert moderator
|
Audio Warfare
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,047 posts
Joined: Mar, 2009
|
Posted - 2012/06/11 : 08:22:05
Cheers man. I think you're right and I am going to change the lead to a more traditional trance arp and possibly keep the bass in the intro going throughout instead of changing to an off beat. I thought 144bpm was about right for Hard Trance? I done a track at 146 and someone told me it sounded too fast for Hard Trance. :P
__________________________________
Listen to released and forthcoming Audio Warfare/Audio Weaponry tunes here:-
http://soundcloud.com/audio-warfare
Alert moderator
|
Warnman
Advanced Member
Germany
2,677 posts
Joined: Jun, 2010
|
Posted - 2012/06/11 : 18:47:24
quote:
Originally posted by Audio Warfare:
Cheers man. I think you're right and I am going to change the lead to a more traditional trance arp and possibly keep the bass in the intro going throughout instead of changing to an off beat. I thought 144bpm was about right for Hard Trance? I done a track at 146 and someone told me it sounded too fast for Hard Trance. :P
Well, I don't know, but the Hardtrance I'm usually listening to is much faster. Trance has awefully slowed down over the past 10-15 years.
For example, this was mixed at 165 bpm:
http://www.mixcloud.com/Sampler19/rave-mix-8/
__________________________________
Ravers unite!
"Happy Hardcore: Love it... hate it... it's fun!" (Matt Stokes)
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2012/06/11 : 20:27:48
Love this mate, bit of a spine tingler!
Tempo sounds fine to me, don't often hear this style being made above 150.
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
_Jay_
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,868 posts
Joined: Oct, 2011
|
Posted - 2012/06/11 : 20:28:56
Very solid. Strong. Like it.
__________________________________
http://HardcoreHighlights.com/
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2012/06/11 : 20:29:36
Oh, just the one criticism though.
I was expecting a Cher cover.
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
Tastetherainobw
Junior Member
United States
105 posts
Joined: Dec, 2011
|
Posted - 2012/06/11 : 21:59:01
Love it!
Alert moderator
|
Audio Warfare
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,047 posts
Joined: Mar, 2009
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 14:15:52
Cheers guys. :) Needs a few tweaks still but we are pretty happy with it so far.
quote:
Originally posted by djDMS:
Oh, just the one criticism though.
I was expecting a Cher cover.
Haha sorry to dissapoint. I'll have to bust out a Cher RMX to make up for it. ;p
quote:
Originally posted by Warnman:
quote:
Originally posted by Audio Warfare:
Cheers man. I think you're right and I am going to change the lead to a more traditional trance arp and possibly keep the bass in the intro going throughout instead of changing to an off beat. I thought 144bpm was about right for Hard Trance? I done a track at 146 and someone told me it sounded too fast for Hard Trance. :P
Well, I don't know, but the Hardtrance I'm usually listening to is much faster. Trance has awefully slowed down over the past 10-15 years.
For example, this was mixed at 165 bpm:
http://www.mixcloud.com/Sampler19/rave-mix-8/
I couldn't get the mix to play. :( All the Hard Trance/House etc. that I hear though is in the kinda 145bpm range. Some people do pitch it up though and in the free party scene around here I've heard people play it at 165bpm (it sounded terrible though).
__________________________________
Listen to released and forthcoming Audio Warfare/Audio Weaponry tunes here:-
http://soundcloud.com/audio-warfare
Alert moderator
Edited by - Audio Warfare on 2012/06/14 14:16:58 |
Lilley
Advanced Member
Australia
3,740 posts
Joined: Jul, 2006
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 14:39:28
quote:
Originally posted by Warnman:
I don't know! 144 bpm sounds very slow for being Hardtrance to my opinion.
Please don't get me wrong. I like this track, but it feels more like proper Hands-Up (and I'm usually no big supporter of Hands-Up).
The acid line at the end is wonderful.
Hmmm, 145 is fine for hard trance. I liked the track, but agree it didn't really feel like hardtrance. While I can't properly place it, to me it feels like a happy hardcore track that has been slowed down - and hence the hands-up feel I think.
Out of curiosity, what does it sound like an octave lower across the main lead?
What I really did very much enjoy was the intro and out. Right pitch right speed, sounded great to my tastes.
__________________________________
nearly in line....
.....strange continuity problems
Alert moderator
Edited by - Lilley on 2012/06/14 14:40:43 |
Lilley
Advanced Member
Australia
3,740 posts
Joined: Jul, 2006
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 14:43:42
Hard trance was around 165, in like, 93.
__________________________________
nearly in line....
.....strange continuity problems
Alert moderator
|
_Jay_
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,868 posts
Joined: Oct, 2011
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 18:32:32
quote:
Originally posted by Audio Warfare:
I was expecting a Cher cover.
Can you do a remix of Bonnie Tyler - Holding On For A Hero instead? With a massively explosive synthy chorus? Loads of energy and drive? PLEASE GARY. :-/
__________________________________
http://HardcoreHighlights.com/
Alert moderator
|
Warnman
Advanced Member
Germany
2,677 posts
Joined: Jun, 2010
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 19:22:25
quote:
Originally posted by Lilley:
Hard trance was around 165, in like, 93.
Well, the majority of the tracks in this mix are from the early to middle of 90's.
__________________________________
Ravers unite!
"Happy Hardcore: Love it... hate it... it's fun!" (Matt Stokes)
Alert moderator
|
Lilley
Advanced Member
Australia
3,740 posts
Joined: Jul, 2006
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 22:29:03
yeh, not a bad mix.
It's really not hard to see where trancecore came from: hmmm, hmmmmm, why dont we... make it faster??
__________________________________
nearly in line....
.....strange continuity problems
Alert moderator
|
djDMS
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
10,304 posts
Joined: Feb, 2003
572 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2012/06/14 : 22:36:40
quote:
Originally posted by _Jay_:
quote:
Originally posted by Audio Warfare:
I was expecting a Cher cover.
Can you do a remix of Bonnie Tyler - Holding On For A Hero instead? With a massively explosive synthy chorus? Loads of energy and drive? PLEASE GARY. :-/
Don't know about you mate but in my head it sounds fantastic!
__________________________________
Taking my time to perfect the beat
Alert moderator
|
_Jay_
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,868 posts
Joined: Oct, 2011
|
Posted - 2012/06/15 : 07:02:19
quote:
Originally posted by djDMS:
Don't know about you mate but in my head it sounds fantastic!
It would be amazing, I'm sure of it. I've been banging on about this for years!
__________________________________
http://HardcoreHighlights.com/
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
