| Author |
Thread |
|
JesterDJ
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,486 posts
Joined: Apr, 2003
|
 Posted - 2006/06/07 : 04:00:17
I always said i was born in the wrong era...
That is hilarious. Hard to believe that that would really be the norm of life. I read this other newspaper cutting from that time too called the "good wife's guide".
Along the same lines, but except it was for keeping the home clean, dinner ready for the man's arrival, keeping the kids quiet so the man can relax etc etc.
i admit, i was in stiches reading that, but that was more out of disbelief.
i think this was down to that back then, correct if i'm wrong DMS Men would work and women took care of the home so it was more widely thought that the men had to withstand more of the everyday pressures than women so they had to "do their part" as it were by helping them relax at home which would have been thought to be the "stress free environment".
Don't get me wrong, thats a bit off-key a way of life, but sorry, its still funny.
Sorry girls! 
__________________________________
JESTER, n. An officer formerly attached to a king's household, whose business it was to amuse the court by ludicrous actions and utterances, the absurdity being attested by his motley costume.
Help your favourite charity for free - www.everyclick.com
Alert moderator 
|
ihaveduff
Advanced Member
Australia
944 posts
Joined: Apr, 2005
28 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 04:26:00
hahahahahaha amusing
its amazing how fast attitudes in society change...
in 2060, that'll be published in a textbook guide for MEN 
__________________________________
Born to Rave:Live to Dance
Alert moderator
|
iluvhrdcor
Advanced Member
Australia
589 posts
Joined: Jan, 2006
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 04:58:22
yeah i f@#*ing hope so!!!!!!
__________________________________
HARDCORE IS WHAT BRINGS THE BEST OUT OF ME
Alert moderator
|
JesterDJ
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
1,486 posts
Joined: Apr, 2003
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 05:17:28
*EDIT*
__________________________________
JESTER, n. An officer formerly attached to a king's household, whose business it was to amuse the court by ludicrous actions and utterances, the absurdity being attested by his motley costume.
Help your favourite charity for free - www.everyclick.com
Alert moderator
Edited by - JesterDJ on 2006/06/07 05:55:21 |
iluvhrdcor
Advanced Member
Australia
589 posts
Joined: Jan, 2006
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 05:25:08
look i am sorry but i just lost my cats and i am very upset right now!
__________________________________
HARDCORE IS WHAT BRINGS THE BEST OUT OF ME
Alert moderator
|
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 09:28:24
quote:
Originally posted by XtarsiA:
quote:
Originally posted by clarke101:
No your missing the point. The point is that if this is real and was actually written in the 60's how times have changed.
Well... U didnt actually make a point in your original post!
I didnt need too. I was sure everyone would know that this would not be relevent in todays society and things like this wouldnt even exist.
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 09:36:31
quote:
Originally posted by Brian K:
quote:
Originally posted by clarke101:
No your missing the point. The point is that if this is real and was actually written in the 60's how times have changed.
don't care when it was written, still funny
I knew you would get it. : )
Do i hear your printer going? Giving a copy to your wife? 
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
XtarsiA
Senior Member
United Kingdom
431 posts
Joined: Mar, 2005
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 09:56:22
quote:
Originally posted by clarke101:
I didnt need too. I was sure everyone would know that this would not be relevent in todays society and things like this wouldnt even exist.
now re-read my original post, with regards to what u just said
THAT was my point 
__________________________________
http://www.xtarsia.net
http://www.myspace.com/XtarsiA
Alert moderator
|
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 10:21:50
quote:
Originally posted by XtarsiA:
quote:
Originally posted by clarke101:
I didnt need too. I was sure everyone would know that this would not be relevent in todays society and things like this wouldnt even exist.
now re-read my original post, with regards to what u just said
THAT was my point
I read your post the first time thanks.
No need to re-read.
Your post doesnt cover what i have just said.
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
kathryn
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
6,520 posts
Joined: Apr, 2005
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 10:52:10
quote:
Originally posted by Spoone:
quote:
Originally posted by iluvhrdcor:
that is the most biggest bull s@*! that i have ever read! who ever wrote that crap is a f@#*ing moron! i am so glad that time has changed!
wheres my cup of tea biitch
:P j/k please dont hit me
 sorry but that was funny! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
__________________________________
:)
Alert moderator
|
XtarsiA
Senior Member
United Kingdom
431 posts
Joined: Mar, 2005
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 10:53:03
quote:
I read your post the first time thanks.
No need to re-read.
Your post doesnt cover what i have just said.
so..
the info u posted was from the 60's.... its not relevent to today... and all of what was said in that quote, is totally ignored.
that nowadays women and men, are pretty much out to satisfy them selves, especially the chav kids, and all these teenage pregnancys, and the MASSIVE increase in divorce...
thats why the quote isnt relevent cos no-one would even think about takin a blind bit of notice, while the quote is very extream, and abit OTT on the stupid side of things.
my point is the quote does have some relevence to TODAY even though it was from the 60's and apears not to.
inset original post here.
AND just because u read my post the first time, doesent mean you shouldnt read it again, if you didnt get what i was trying to say the first time round.
__________________________________
http://www.xtarsia.net
http://www.myspace.com/XtarsiA
Alert moderator
Edited by - XtarsiA on 2006/06/07 10:54:46 |
mnmcandiez
Advanced Member
United States
507 posts
Joined: Feb, 2005
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 11:47:08
haha that's something else
__________________________________
What the hell is happy hardcore?
Alert moderator
|
clarke101
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,839 posts
Joined: Jun, 2003
185 hardcore releases
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 12:23:46
quote:
Originally posted by XtarsiA:
quote:
I read your post the first time thanks.
No need to re-read.
Your post doesnt cover what i have just said.
so..
the info u posted was from the 60's.... its not relevent to today... and all of what was said in that quote, is totally ignored.
that nowadays women and men, are pretty much out to satisfy them selves, especially the chav kids, and all these teenage pregnancys, and the MASSIVE increase in divorce...
thats why the quote isnt relevent cos no-one would even think about takin a blind bit of notice, while the quote is very extream, and abit OTT on the stupid side of things.
my point is the quote does have some relevence to TODAY even though it was from the 60's and apears not to.
inset original post here.
AND just because u read my post the first time, doesent mean you shouldnt read it again, if you didnt get what i was trying to say the first time round.
Is that you were trying to convey with your first post?
It has no relevence in todays society because it says basically that women shouldnt worry about personnal enjoyment, etc. They are there to please men and do what men want.
Im sure in most parts of the western world this attitude would be laughed at.
I dont think you can put an increased divorce rate just down to people wanting to satisfy themselves. Which is how your point came across.
__________________________________
Panda Style
Alert moderator
|
XtarsiA
Senior Member
United Kingdom
431 posts
Joined: Mar, 2005
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 13:21:38
quote:
I dont think you can put an increased divorce rate just down to people wanting to satisfy themselves.
XD - its a basic frame of mind.. from wich lots of things can come from. I reckon its very much the case.
im off to buy my girl a supprise preasent now :D
__________________________________
http://www.xtarsia.net
http://www.myspace.com/XtarsiA
Alert moderator
|
Ionosphere
Advanced Member
United Kingdom
3,750 posts
Joined: Dec, 2004
|
Posted - 2006/06/07 : 15:18:46
Even now, in the 21st century, when people marry and use the traditional marriage vows
they promise to cherish each other.
I repeat, each other.
Isn't this what XtarsiA is talking about -
cherish
English
Verb - to cherish
To treat with tenderness and affection; to nurture with care; to protect and aid.
To hold dear; to embrace with interest; to indulge; to encourage; etc etc
Sadly, I doubt that most understand exactly what they are promising....
__________________________________
This- http://www.discogs.com/artist/Ionosphere
THIS - http://soundcloud.com/ionosphere
VIDEO - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nYWkHCkaho
Alert moderator
|
Printer friendly
